Showing posts with label fake news. Show all posts
Showing posts with label fake news. Show all posts

Friday, April 14, 2017

Facebook has shut down about 30,000 fake accounts in France to combat fake news

Facebook has shut down about 30,000 fake accounts in France to combat fake news

Image: Reuters
Facebook Inc said on Thursday it suspended 30,000 accounts in France as the social network giant steps up efforts to stop the spread of fake news, misinformation and spam. The move, which comes 10 days before the first round of a hotly contested French presidential election, is among the most aggressive yet by Facebook to move against accounts that violate its terms of service, rather than simply respond to complaints.
Facebook is under intense pressure in Europe as governments across the continent threaten new laws and fines unless the company moves quickly to remove extremist propaganda or other content that violates local laws. The pressure on social media sites including Twitter, Google’s YouTube and Facebook has intensified in the run-up to the elections in France and Germany.
Facebook already has a program in France to use outside fact-checkers to combat fake news in users’ feeds. Also on Thursday, Facebook took out full-page ads in Germany’s best-selling newspapers to educate readers on how to spot fake news. U.S. intelligence agencies have determined that the Russian government interfered with the U.S. election last year in order to help Donald Trump win the presidency. Officials say a similar campaign is under way in Europe to promote right-wing, nationalist parties and undermine the European Union.
In a blog post, Facebook said it was acting against 30,000 fake accounts in France. It said its priority was to remove suspect accounts with high volumes of posting activity and the biggest audiences. Two people familiar with Facebook’s process said the company had strengthened its formula for detecting deceptive accounts being run by automated means. As an example, the new process considers accounts that have smaller circles of friends and that therefore had been less of a priority previously.
A key motivator was the need to get tougher on misinformation ahead of the French elections, the people said, although the move also targets accounts that generated spam for financial gain. “We’ve made improvements to recognize these inauthentic accounts more easily by identifying patterns of activity — without assessing the content itself,” Shabnam Shaik, a Facebook security team manager, wrote in an official blog post.
The company is using automated pattern-recognition to identify repeated posting of the same content and increases in messaging. Thursday’s action follows other moves by Facebook to make it easier for users to report potential fraud and hoaxes.
Reuters
Publish date: April 14, 2017 1:20 pm| Modified date: April 14, 2017 1:20 pm

Wednesday, April 5, 2017

Facebook is working with Mozilla, Wikipedia, academics to make News Integrity Initiative

Facebook is working with Mozilla, Wikipedia, academics to make News Integrity Initiative

Image: Reuters
To ensure the news that internet users get is not fake, Facebook is leading a consortium that is pouring $14 million into the creation of a News Integrity Initiative. Apart from academics and non-profits, Mozilla and Wikipedia founder Jimmy Wales are also part of the consortium.
The News Integrity Initiative aims to develop tools that will help people be sensitive towards stories they read online. “The City University of New York Graduate School of Journalism will administer the initiative and will spearhead new literacy and aim to increase trust in journalism around the world,” a news release on the website of CUNY Graduate School of Journalism said.
After US President Donald Trump was declared winning candidate in 2016 presidential elections, Facebook came under severe criticism for promoting and breeding fake news on its platform. To fight the fake news and rebuild its credibility, the networking giant announced a number of projects and users to identify and weed out fake stories.
“The initiative will address the problems of misinformation, disinformation and the opportunities the internet provides to inform the public conversation in new ways,” Facebook’s head of news partnerships, Campbell Brown, said in a statement.
Publish date: April 5, 2017 12:42 pm| Modified date: April 5, 2017 1:14 pm

Saturday, February 18, 2017

Mark Zuckerberg talks of using Facebook to transform the world in his ideologically charged treatise

Mark Zuckerberg talks of using Facebook to transform the world in his ideologically charged treatise

Image: Reuters
By 
“Are we building the world we all want?” That’s the question Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg is asking us in his treatise titled ‘Building Global Community.’
Addressed to the community, the entire 6,000 word manifesto talks about Zuckerberg’s plan of transforming Facebook into supportive, safe, informed, civically-engaged and inclusive, global community. He talks about history bringing people together, of building social infrastructure to “empower us to achieve things we couldn’t do on our own.”
He says, “Our greatest challenges need a global response” and that, “Progress now requires humanity coming together not just as cities or nations, but also as a global community.”
That community, Zuckerberg believes, is Facebook. He states that Facebook has so far focussed on connecting friends and families, but that now, it will focus on “developing the social infrastructure of community.” He adds that Facebook is a work in progress, that learning and improving is simply a part of the culture.
To achieve this, Zuckerberg will now align Facebook around the building of communities. Communities that are “supportive safe, informed, civically engaged and inclusive.”
Zuckerberg intends to build an idealistic world, and to that end, I’m very much in favour of his vision. However, I don’t trust Facebook to actually take responsibility for doing the right thing.
Facebook is a company, not an NGO
Facebook is a company first, a community leader only incidentally. As a company it’s built around only one concept, making profits. It will work for the greater good of the community only if that work translates to the greater good of Facebook’s shareholders.
Image: Reuters
Image: Reuters
While Zuckerberg’s mission statement paints a pretty picture, we must not forget that it’s Facebook’s actions up till now that have led to the rise of Trump, the proliferation of fake news at a global scale and the filter bubbles that Facebook’s algorithms encouraged, however unintentional those actions were.
As Medium’s Frederic Filloux so eloquently explains in a blog post, “Facebook is above all an advertising machine. A fantastic one.”
He explains that Facebook’s revenue system is built around page views and sharing and that, “Sharing is key because it leads to higher page consumption which, in turn, leads to multiple bespoke advertising exposures.”
To achieve this, Facebook’s algorithms fine-tune what you see based on your interests. Facebook ensures that you stay in a comfort zone that it’s algorithms build for you. You will not be shown posts that are contrary to what Facebook’s algorithms determine are your beliefs.
In other words, you will not be shown posts that you wouldn’t “like”.
Facebook created the ultimate filter bubble
It’s not that we’re intentionally saying that we don’t want to see the real world. Facebook determined that it didn’t want to show us the bigger picture. We weren’t really given a choice in the matter. Facebook is indirectly shaping our thoughts.
I’m not accusing Facebook of deliberately bringing Trump to power or encouraging fake news. No, Facebook did none of those things. However, Facebook has left us at the mercy of Zuckerberg’s view of the world.
Image: Reuters
Image: Reuters
As Adam Mosseri, VP of Product Management for News Feed himself said, “We are in the business of connecting people and ideas — and matching people with the stories they find most meaningful.” He’s oblivious of the fact that he is, in effect, describing a filter bubble.
Filter bubbles are bad because they isolate us in our own cultural and ideological bubbles.
“Facebook is also incredibly effective at weakening the norms that hold real-world communities together,” says Wired.
Fake News and community responsibility are only a problem now because Donald Trump is in power. If Hillary Clinton was president, we wouldn’t have heard a peep from Facebook.
Filloux says it best when he says, “Facebook will solve just enough of the fake news to put down the raging PR fire. But the company will never jeopardise its money machine for the sake of mere societal considerations.”
So what’s Zuckerberg’s plan?
Facebook has always been a bunch of fractured, isolated communities that reside on a common platform. While Facebook encourages interaction with friends and family, it has so far actively discouraged interaction between rival communities.
Zuckerberg wants to fix this and he wants to start by bringing people from like-minded communities together and improve discourse.
“Research suggests the best solutions for improving discourse may come from getting to know each other as whole people instead of just opinions,” writes Zuckerberg.
Image: Reuters
Image: Reuters
The plan is to bring diverse communities together, not on ideology, but on interests. Cricket fans and football fans coming together with other sports communities, for example. Zuckerberg wants to build a platform that will enable better communication among these communities so people will get to know each other. These platforms will then be used to encourage discourse on topics that matter. This includes civic responsibility, being more inclusive, etc.
Fighting fake news is also a big concern. For a start, Facebook will start using a combination of big data, AI and human curation to cut down on sensationalist stories. It’s easy to determine sensationalist stories, writes Zuckerberg, because people usually share the headlines without reading the content.
If people read the content and share it, such a story, and its publisher, will be ranked higher than one that’s shared without reading.

Thursday, January 12, 2017

Facebook Journalism Project adds new formats and measures to curb fake news

Facebook Journalism Project adds new formats and measures to curb fake news

By 
The Facebook Journalism Project is an initiative to establish stronger ties between Facebook and the news industry. Facebook is in the process of testing and introducing new content formats for publishers, is deploying training and tools for journalists, and taking measures to reduce fake news.
Live is realtime streaming of video content, similar to news shows on television. 360 is taken to mean immersive virtual reality experiences that people can consume through headsets, or using inputs to look around on flat screens. Facebook recently introduced Live 360 videos, with National Geographic being the partner. Instant articles are predominantly written content with multimedia embeds, that are served directly from Facebook itself, without redirecting to the web site of the publisher.
Facebook introduced Live 360 videos in an exclusive partnership with National Geographic. Image: Facebook
Facebook introduced Live 360 videos in an exclusive partnership with National Geographic. Image: Facebook
Live, 360, and instant articles are some of the formats for presenting news that publishers have liked so far. Facebook is introducing additional formats by testing them with select publishers. Packages of stories are being tested, where several instant news articles are presented at once. Hindustan Times and Indiatimes are Indian news organisations participating in the initial testing period. The finer details of how best this presentation should occour is being worked out. Users should start seeing packages of instant articles in their news feeds, from predominant publishers.
Facebook is collaborating with news organisations around the world to figure out exactly how several instant articles can be presented at once. One of the planned ways of doing this is to package several stories together under a cover image. Users are presented with the cover image, and when tapped, they can slide horizontally for swiping between stories, or scroll vertically to read each individual story. Facebook is looking to partner with more news organisations to develop the necessary presentation formats.
Facebook Live is getting an update where page owners can designate certain contributors to go Live from their handsets. This does not compromise the security of the page, but still allows contributors to go Live on behalf of the page. There is a plan to roll out all the features available to pages, to individual end users as well. Facebook has provided instructions on how to set up contributors that can go live on a page.
Facebook Instant Articles. Image: Facebook Media
Facebook Instant Articles. Image: Facebook Media
Journalists will be provided with feedback on how well their videos are performing, in times of views, shares and engagement. Information such as total number of followers, minutes for which the video was viewed will also be available to journalists. The video metrics information will only be available on profiles with a minimum of 5,000 followers. There is now a permalink landing page for all the video content of a page. Any user who navigates to that page will be served a live broadcast available, or the previously uploaded video content in a brand new interface.
Crossposting of Live videos have now been enabled, but the posting can only happen after the Live has been concluded. Page owners have more powerful tools to manage and present the discussion around their Lives. Publishers can choose which comments on a video deserve to be read first, and can pin these below the video. Facebook automatically picks a comment to display below the video as of now. The move offers more control to the video content creators.
Facebook is introducing whole new ways for publishers to widen their subscriber base, through the use of novel and emerging business models. Facebook is planning to push out free subscriptions to the most engaged users, from within the instant articles. Facebook is collaborating with German news organisation Bild to pilot this project. Facebook is taking steps to support local news sources and independent media houses. Directly working with the local media, Facebook is in the process of deciding how best to present these news articles.
One of the ways Facebook will make products around news ideas is workshops with the news business, where Facebook engineers will hack together new solutions based on the requirements of the news organisations. The hackathons will see the identification of new opportunities, and the development of solutions for these. Facebook says it will take inputs from journalists and news organisations, in an effort to take the project forward.
The journalists will have to be trained to use these new tools. Facebook is partnering with Poynter to introduce a certificate course for journalists. The existing training program has been expanded to nine additional languages.
Facebook is going to partner with educational institutions to provide training on site, directly at newsrooms around the world. The new features of the platform, building audiences, and distributing the content over Facebook are some of the topics already covered by Facebook e-learning courses for journalists.
Facebook is taking a number of steps to tackle the fake news problem. Measures are being taken to disrupt the financial incentives for spammers. Facebook has launched a program with third party fact checking organisations to identify hoaxes that spread on Facebook. Facebook is introducing new features to allow users to report fake news articles more easily. Facebook notes that fake news is a platform independent problem.
reporting Fake News on Facebook.
reporting Fake News on Facebook.
One of the initiatives by Facebook is working on to curb the menace of fake news is a series of public service advertisements that educate the masses on the importance of consuming news in a critical manner. The end users who spread misinformation on social networks because of their own biases are as responsible, if not more, than the publishers who seed the fake news on the platform. The public service advertisements will be made in collaboration with The News Literacy Project. Facebook has said that its long term goal is to improve news literacy with help from news organisations for new ideas to do so. Facebook has committed to providing financial backing to improve news literacy in readers, if needed.
Facebook is a member of the First Draft Partner Network, that works at formulating best practices and ethical guidelines on sourcing news stories from the social web. The network has over 80 publishers, and Facebook will be helping the network establish a virtual verification community. Journalists often encounter breaking news stories from individual users on social networking platforms, particularly the micro-blogging platform Twitter. Verifying the sources before publishing is an important step in making sure that misinformation does not spread.
Verified users will investigate and authenticate images, videos, photos and claims that have been challenged. The partner organisations will use the results of the investigations to feed their audiences. A public feed of the results of the investigations will also be available. Efforts are being made to reduce the damage to eyewitnesses who have been suddenly caught in breaking news situations. Partner networks include Twitter, AFP, The New York Times, CNN, Washington Post and Reuters.
Being made to tackle the fake news problem is a blessing in disguise for Facebook. Facebook and news organisations have to work together for mutual benefit. Facebook has an even more strong foothold in the news publishing sector now. Facebook is steadily growing beyond a social network, and has been invading culture, media, and governance.

Thursday, December 15, 2016

Fake news: Facebook is rolling out new tools to identify and report stories

Fake news: Facebook is rolling out new tools to identify and report stories

Image: Which.co.uk
By 
Facebook has announced the rollout of new tools that will help the company fight the menace of ‘Fake News.’ This comes right after the company came under fire from US President Barak Obama and governments across the world to accountability for the inaccurate or fake news that is shared on the platform.
Facebook Fake News 3
Facebook has pointed out that the tools will allow users to quickly report any fake news story using the ‘Report’ feature already present for the posts on Facebook. The company has added a new “It’s a fake news story” in the options and allows the users to mark the story as Fake and message the person who posted the story to notify about the story. Apart from relying on crowdsourcing to report the potential ‘Fake news stories,’ the company has also announced a partnership with third-party fact-checking companies.
Facebook detailed that it is working with five companies about the fact-checking organisations which include ABC News, AP, FactCheck.org, Snopes and Politifact as reported by The Guardian. All the third-party fact-checking websites are signatories of Poynter’s International Fact Checking Code of Principles.  If a news story is pointed out as inaccurate, the post will include “Disputed by 3rd Party Fact-Checkers” providing a link to the article refuting the original news article.
Facebook Fake News
One interesting thing to note is that both the features, Third-Party Fact Checkers and Crowd-sourcing to report articles do not work in isolation. The news articles are sent to the face checking websites after the original article has been reported as ‘Fake Story’ by sufficient amount of users. People sharing the disputed articles will get a warning sign informing them about the disputed status of the article.
According to the company, the ‘Disputed’ articles will figure lower on the newsfeed and the publisher or the person who posted the article can not promote the article. The company announced that it had removed the ability to spoof domain names to stop confusion caused by such domains.

Saturday, November 26, 2016

Angela Merkel fears bots on social media may sway public opinion in upcoming German election

Angela Merkel fears bots on social media may sway public opinion in upcoming German election

German Chancellor Angela Merkel REUTERS/Fabrizio Bensch
Chancellor Angela Merkel’s biggest contender in next year’s German election campaign may not be a rival party leader but so-called “social bots” – software programmed to sway opinion on social media sites. In her first speech to parliament since announcing plans on Sunday to seek a fourth term as chancellor, Merkel called for a debate on how fake news, bots and trolls can manipulate public opinion.
“In order to reach people, to inspire people, we need to deal with this phenomenon and – where necessary – regulate it,” Merkel told lawmakers on Wednesday. The role social networks Facebook and Twitter play in spreading false and malicious information has shot up Merkel’s agenda after the shock election of U.S. Republican candidate Donald Trump as president. Social bots are software programs that mimic human behaviour on social media sites, such as by publishing messages or liking posts. They can be used to spread erroneous information and muddy the debate. Some critics say the proliferation of fake news helped sway the U.S. election in Trump’s favor.
With the far-right Alternative for Germany (AfD) having chipped away at support for Merkel’s conservatives by attacking her open-door refugee policy, alarm is growing over the influence of bots and fake news on potential voters. In a sign of how seriously Merkel is taking the matter, she invited Simon Hegelich, professor of political data science at the Technical University of Munich, to brief the executive committee of her Christian Democrats (CDU) on Monday.
“Merkel is really interested in the topic of bots and fake news and hate speech on the Internet and she’s very well informed,” said Hegelich. While all of Germany’s political parties have said they will not deploy bots in the campaign, the fact that they are mostly anonymous makes it hard to work out who is behind them. Hegelich does not rule out third parties using them to try to discredit parties or politicians.
The head of the domestic intelligence agency raised concern last week about potential Russian interference in Germany’s election through the use of misleading media stories. Moreover, fake news has become a lucrative business model. In the U.S. election campaign, bloggers without political affiliation realized they could earn money by spreading sensational and false stories. “They act as if they were a news provider, but all the news is fake. It doesn’t matter if it’s true or not, it’s just a business model to get more clicks on advertising,” said Hegelich.
Echo Rooms
Germany’s established parties, the CDU and the center-left Social Democrats (SPD), are lagging the AfD in engagement on social media. The AfD has racked up more than 300,000 likes on Facebook, while the CDU and SPD can barely muster 240,000 together. While this may not seem many among Germany’s 62 million voters, many Facebook users share posts with one another, increasing their reach.
Algorithms on Facebook also shape what content appears in a user’s news feed, creating so-called “echo rooms” in which posts only reflect user’s own views. Facing a barrage of criticism for failing to stem a flood of phoney news articles in the run-up to the U.S. election, Facebook Chief Executive Mark Zuckerberg has disclosed steps to weed out hoaxes and other false information. These include making it easier to report false content, working with third-party verification organizations and journalists on fact-checking efforts, and exploring posting warning labels on content that has been flagged as false.
Justice Minister Heiko Maas said last week Germany would closely monitor how Facebook responds to the challenge of fake news, but said legislative measures were limited. Merkel has raised the idea of a code of conduct for social networks. Thomas Jarzombek, the CDU’s spokesman for digital policy, says more transparency is needed and called on journalists at traditional media companies to debunk fake news and create a more informed debate.
He said with 10 months to go until the election, he believed Germany had time to raise awareness of the issue among voters.
Reuters

Tuesday, November 15, 2016

After Facebook, Google shows fake news in search results, admits it needs to improve

After Facebook, Google shows fake news in search results, admits it needs to improve

Image: Reuters
Google’s search engine highlighted an inaccurate story claiming that President-elect Donald Trump won the popular vote in last week’s election, the latest example of bogus information spread by the internet’s gatekeepers. The incorrect results were shown Monday in a two-day-old story posted on the pro-Trump “70 News” site. A link to the site appeared at or near the top of Google’s influential rankings of relevant news stories for searches on the final election results.
Google acknowledged the problem, although as of mid-afternoon Monday, the link to “70 News” remained prominent in its results. Although Google rarely removes content from its search results, the company is taking steps to punish sites that manufacture falsehoods. In a move disclosed Monday, Google says it will prevent its lucrative digital ads from appearing on sites that “misrepresent, misstate, or conceal information.” The action could give sites a bigger incentive to get things right or risk losing a valuable source of revenue.
Fake News on Steroids
False information is nothing new on the internet, where debunkers have been batting down unfounded claims and urban legends for more than two decades. But the problem has gained more attention in the post-mortem of a bitterly contested presidential election in which Trump, a Republican billionaire and former reality TV star, defeated Hillary Clinton, a Democrat and former U.S. secretary of state who had been leading in the polls.
Trump wound up prevailing in enough key states to win the Electoral College’s decisive vote, but is trailing Clinton in the overall popular vote with some ballots still being counted. Clinton’s lead in the popular vote has become one of the flashpoints in the protests against Trump’s election being staged in cities across the country. Google is just the latest company in the crosshairs. Fake news stories uncritically circulated during and after the election on Facebook have sparked a debate over the role of social media companies, which are key sources of news for large numbers of people. Critics suggest that these companies should be more careful to ensure they aren’t passing along misleading information.
Social Media and the News
Google’s dominant search engine is the leading source of traffic to media sites, according to the online analytics firm Chartbeat. Meanwhile, a study by the Pew Research Center found about 60 percent of Americans get at least some of their news from social media sites such as Facebook, which now has 178 million users in the U.S. and Canada. In the election’s aftermath, Facebook has been accused of possibly swaying the election’s outcome by promoting fake news stories on its social network. Last summer, the company fired a handful of journalists who oversaw its “trending” news list and replaced them with an algorithm; fake news stories quickly began to trend.
CEO Mark Zuckerberg brushed off that criticism as “crazy” in an appearance last week. He elaborated in a Saturday post on Facebook in which he asserted that “more than 99 percent of what people see” on Facebook is authentic. Zuckerberg conceded more needs to be done to block bogus information, but said that determining what’s blatantly wrong isn’t always an easy task.
“Identifying the ‘truth’ is complicated,” Zuckerberg wrote. “While some hoaxes can be completely debunked, a greater amount of content, including from mainstream sources, often gets the basic idea right but some details wrong or omitted.” The stories featured in the feeds of Facebook users are primarily selected by automated formulas known as algorithms. Google’s search results are also powered by algorithms that the company regularly revises to thwart sites that attempt to artificially boost their prominence.
More, better Algorithms? 
Google conceded its search engine misfired with the 70 News story that falsely declared Trump the popular vote winner in both its headline and the body of the text. “In this case we clearly didn’t get it right, but we are continually working to improve our algorithms,” the company said in a statement. Bad information in an online headline or at the top of a story can be particularly damaging. Roughly 53 percent of the people who land on a web page stay for 15 seconds or less, according to Chartbeat’s findings.
Incorrect information is bound to ripple across the internet as more people rely on their phones, computers and other digital devices to read news that is picked out for them by automated programs, said media analyst Ken Doctor of Newsonomics.
“What we are seeing is the failure of the algorithm,” Doctor said. “These algorithms bring a lot of things into our lives that humans cannot do. But when algorithms fail, it highlights the fact that they are not just some kind of neutral technology. They are programmed by human beings and they have all the failings of human beings.” It’s difficult to know what happened when an algorithm goes awry because Google, Facebook and other internet companies closely guard how they work, much the way Coca-Cola protects the recipe for its soda.
But the growing power that Google and Facebook hold over the flow of information could increase the political pressure for them to be held more accountable, Doctor said.
In the meantime, most people remain skeptical about what they read online. Only 4 percent of Americans have a lot of confidence in what they read on social media sites, according to Pew. Local news organizations fared better in Pew Research’s survey earlier this year, with 22 percent of Americans saying they trusted the information there.
AP

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...